<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>St. Thomas Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org</link>
	<description>Law Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Arbitrations in Florida: A Tale of Two Courts</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=574</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=574#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 43 (Fall 2012).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 43 (Fall 2012).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=574</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Applying Economic Loss Doctrine to Article 2 Transactions: A Doctrine at a Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=572</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=572#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 19 (Fall 2012).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 19 (Fall 2012).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=572</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarifying State Action Immunity Under the Antitrust Laws: FTC V. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=570</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=570#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 73 (Fall 2012).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 73 (Fall 2012).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=570</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under the Lens of the Constitution: The NDAA&#8217;s Detainee Provisions and the Fifth Amendment&#8217;s Guarantee of Equal Protection</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=567</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=567#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 105 (Fall 2012).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 105 (Fall 2012).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=567</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Must We Hide: The Ethics of Privacy and the Ethos of Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=559</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=559#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2012).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25 St. Thomas L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2012).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=559</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Secure These Rights: The Supreme Court and Snyder v. Phelps</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=444</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=444#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 101 (Fall 2011).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 101 (Fall 2011).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=444</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The DREAM Act and the Right to Equal Educational Opportunity: An Analysis of U.S. and International Human Rights Frameworks as they Relate to Education Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=440</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=440#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 68 (Fall 2011).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 68 (Fall 2011).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=440</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida&#8217;s Adoption of the Uniform Power of Attorney Act: Is it Sufficient to Protect Florida&#8217;s Vulnerable Adults?</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=435</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=435#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 32 (Fall 2011).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 32 (Fall 2011).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=435</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida&#8217;s Blaine Amendment: Goldilocks and the Separate but Equal Doctrine</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=423</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=423#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2011).

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 1 (Fall 2011).<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=423</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush v. Gore: A Decade Later</title>
		<link>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=246</link>
		<comments>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The St. Thomas Law Review is proud to announce our upcoming symposium, Bush v. Gore: A Decade Later.  This event will be held on our campus on November 12-13, 2010.  The symposium will examine the election from the viewpoint of the judiciary, attorneys who participated in the litigation, administrators and legal scholars. Professor Nathaniel Persily [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The St. Thomas Law Review is proud to announce our upcoming symposium, Bush v. Gore: A Decade Later.  This event will be held on our campus on November 12-13, 2010.  The symposium will examine the election from the viewpoint of the judiciary, attorneys who participated in the litigation, administrators and legal scholars. Professor Nathaniel Persily of Columbia Law School will be moderating the various discussion panels.  Professor Persily and Professor Murray Greenberg have been instrumental in planning a symposium that will present a comprehensive review of the 2000 election.  A detailed schedule of events will be available shortly.  Admission is complimentary for STU faculty and students, admission information for all others will be available soon.  Please contact the Law Review office at <a title="mailto:lawrev@stu.edu" href="mailto:lawrev@stu.edu">lawrev@stu.edu</a> if you have any questions.<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stthomaslawreview.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=246</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
